EthicalFin recently convened a spirited discussion with an intimate group of impact investors in central London, moderated by Charles Wookey, founder of Blueprint for Better Business, to explore the topic “The Purpose of Money.”
There is no doubt that money plays a multifaceted role in society, with meaning that extends well beyond its basic functions as a medium of exchange and a store of value. In our conversation, we wanted to explore and interrogate its more profound connection to deeply rooted beliefs in people and influences on society and discuss the “difficult questions” with regards to money. One immediate reaction many people had in the room is that we rarely talk about money, and thus everyone welcomed the chance to discuss this openly, under Chatham House rules.
In this brief writeup, we aim to summarise and share some of the key themes from the discussion, with the intent to both capture a fascinating discussion, but also to open the discussion to any others that wish to engage. We believe that understanding the broader dimensions of money is crucial for investors seeking to align their capital with values and purpose and contribute to building the future they imagine for humanity.
Our starting point was on the role of money. Most obviously, money has been designed as a fundamental medium of exchange and a store of value. However, its role in society extends far beyond these technical functions. Our discussion highlighted the profound impact of money on individual well-being, societal structures, and the potential for driving systemic change. For those seeking to align their investments with purpose, a deeper consideration of these broader dimensions of money is essential.
Here are a few of the broader themes we considered:
Money significantly impacts societal well-being. Income inequality can lead to increased anxiety and depression. The prevailing emphasis on consumerism, often fuelled by the pursuit of wealth, also warrants scrutiny. Welfare economics plays a crucial role in addressing these issues through taxation and redistribution. Therefore, a critical question for investors is: How can investment strategies actively contribute to a more equitable and less “money anxious” society? What specific actions can be taken to mitigate the negative social consequences of income disparities? How can impact investing models be leveraged to support the less privileged and promote a more just distribution of resources?
The accumulation of wealth has complex psychological causes and effects. Beyond a certain threshold, more money does not necessarily lead to greater fulfilment, and can even foster a sense of never having enough. The pursuit of self-worth can become intertwined with wealth accumulation, creating a potentially precarious foundation for well-being. This prompts investors to reflect on: What is a healthy and sustainable relationship with money, both individually and collectively? How can investors and the organizations they support redefine success beyond purely financial metrics? What role can investments play in fostering genuine well-being and a sense of purpose that transcends monetary value?
Intrinsic motivation is a crucial force beyond money. Self-determination theory suggests that for complex tasks, relying solely on extrinsic monetary rewards can be less effective than fostering intrinsic motivation. This challenges the conventional wisdom that financial incentives are the primary driver of performance and innovation. Investors should therefore consider: How can investment strategies prioritize and support environments that nurture intrinsic motivation? Can investment criteria go beyond financial projections to assess the purpose-driven nature of the organizations being funded? How can investors encourage and measure non-monetary factors that contribute to long-term success and impact?
Cultural and personal beliefs profoundly shape our relationship with money. Different cultures exhibit distinct orientations towards money, ranging from individualistic to more community-focused perspectives. Money is often a “taboo” topic of conversation, and either celebrated or demonised for its role in our lives. Ultimately, money is a fictitious construct, and the role we see money playing in our lives, society, and culture is shaped by our conscious and unconscious beliefs. Consequently, investors must ask: How do our own deeply held beliefs and cultural conditioning influence our investment decisions and priorities? Are we consciously aware of these biases, and how might they shape the flow of capital? How can we engage with investees and stakeholders in a way that respects and understands their diverse perspectives on the role and purpose of money?
Money has the potential to be a powerful catalyst for good and drive essential systemic change. It can fuel innovation, support the development of sustainable solutions, and facilitate a transition away from extractive economic models. But when it stagnates, it “stinks”. Furthermore, compelling narratives, lighthouse projects and effective storytelling can inspire individuals and institutions to deploy capital in ways that generate positive impact.
This leads to the fundamental questions for investors seeking to make a difference: How can we strategically allocate capital to address pressing systemic challenges and support transformative solutions? What narratives can we champion that highlight the potential of money to create a more just and sustainable world, thereby attracting more capital towards impactful investments? How can we leverage our networks and influence to advocate for the necessary behavioural and systemic changes in our economic models?
In conclusion, our exploration of money’s purpose reveals a complex interplay of economic functions, social impacts, mental constructs, psychological considerations, cultural influences, and the potential for transformative change in human systems. Moving beyond a purely transactional view of money allows investors to consider their role in shaping a more equitable, sustainable, and fulfilling future for all. The questions raised here are not merely academic; they are critical prompts for reflection and action within the impact investing community and beyond.
Comments are closed.
